Google vs. Nettrekker

Google:
-I felt that Google was a little worse than Nettrekker because Google has info of everything that is anything.
-My keywords were ineffective on Google because they were too broad. I came up with a lot of random things that did not help my topic.
-I felt that if I used a full sentence or a lot more specific detail, I might be able to get something useful out of it.

Nettreker:
-In Nettrekker, my keywords were a little too specific. I got a but more helpful info out of it than Google, but it still didn't come up with anything that was my topic.
-My keywords came up with things that were close to my topic, but were not my topic. If I used a keyword that was less specific, I think I would come up with better topics.

Opposing Viewpoints

	Opposing Viewpoints	Points of View	Ebsco
Search - ease of use	A little hard.	Also a little hard.	Easier.
Results - relevance and usefulness	Nothing that I was looking for.	Nothing that I was looking for.	Hard to find main topic.
Saving documents	Easy, but hard to see where it was saved.	Easy, but hard to see where it was saved.	Same thing.
Citations	Easy.	Easy.	Slightly less easy.
Other features (you define and describe 3-5 others)
Feature #1	A lot of keywords available	Quick search	Hard to get to actual search database
Feature #2	Quick search	A lot of options	Quick search
Feature #3	A lot of options	Popular	Options
Feature #4	Popular	Optional lists/choices	A lot of keywords available

Del.i.cious

My Del.i.cious account did not work, it would not let me log in, so I am going to post them here.

-